I have done four cases until today. I will update some thoughts about three of them. The case study process is really interesting since the case could bring us a real life situation, providing a platform to discuss and to dig deeper into the possible solutions.
1st - Cross Selling Or Cross Purposes
The first one is a case about the organization structure. How to balance the sales and consultants within the organization? How to come up a rewarding system to encourage both sides to co-op but to have a conflict? It is a typical problem that the big organizations face all the time. This case let me recall my life in Chinatrust since CTCB was looking for an answer for this kind of problem. It is easy for us to stick to how to re-org the structure to encourage the mutual understanding between two parties but the humanity does not work that way, right? We all know this but tend to neglect this point when coming up a solution. After a long debate, Albert gave us a solution that amazed me a lot – to set a book value for each sales and a fixed ration of the book value for the other party. This method will contribute to a positive relationship between two sides and result in a useful evaluation system; you can call it a control system if you like. That is the value of MANAGEMENT! Without a good management system, even the best talents can’t really know how to deliver good performance in the organization.
2nd - All the Wrong Moves
The second case was about the decision making process of certain company and the leadership style of top manager. This CEO tends to be the “nice” guy who always looks for opinions and, usually, the decisions from other people. He tries to be nice to everyone so he can’t really gives his employees clear direction and makes the good decision based on the sufficient information. The decision process is loosing and no one really knows where the problem comes from. Of course, who dare to say the CEO is the problem. What is interesting is that this company hires a consultant to de-structure the decision process and to point out the problem. This consultant gives a presentation about the rough information he gets from several interviews with the middle management people. The direction to the answer is quite clear but the way to point out the problem might be very challenging, since no one is so stupid as to blame on the person who pays him the money.
3rd - The Cane Mutiny
The third one was about the HR problem. This week Albert assigned another reading material for me and Alex. The book calls MBA in a day. Honestly speaking, this book is quite skin deep for the person who studied “Business Administration” for years but I found this book very helpful. Although the content of the book is really general, the structure helps me a lot when tackling the case. Take this case for example. I read the HR chapter of MBA in a day this week so when I read the case about HR this week; I can break the case into the structure quickly and precisely. Combining with my working experience, I finally can come up with a suggestion that looks ok. The learning is easy for understanding but not easy for execution in the real world. HR needs to take the following steps,
1. Work with management team to pin down the short-term and long term goal
2. To find out the current employees’ capability
3. Find out the gap between the current employees’ capability and the capability that company’s future goal needs.
What is the most difficult part? I would say stage one might be the most difficult part for Taiwan companies since so many of them change the plan so often without solid planning structure and logic. “Losers are those who make decision slowly and change their decision often”. So CEO or the management team needs to do their duty to come up a distinct plan for their company then the departments know how to come up the plan aligning with the company goal. The case is talking about a company’s market is aging and its employees are aging as well. HR manager is afraid of the shrinking market might affect the bottom line of the company and also worries about the recruiting effectiveness and efficiency. So he proposes to invest more on the welfare to make the company a better place to stay, lack of reasoning between the problem and the solution. This German company should realize the developed country population is always getting smaller, no one can change that. So what it can do is to leverage on its core competency, the hi-tech and the know-how, to grab the market out of its local market. This strategy might totally change its HR plan. It might need to hire the sales from different market, which depends on its market expanding plan, and only leave the people with the core competency at the HQ. Becoming a global player in its market, the company should be looking for the employees with better mobility and flexibility and with more international experience to deal with the international working process. Moreover, how to retain the knowledge of the current aging employees and to pass this core value to the younger new comers is also a task for the HR department. Knowledge management is such an important system that this company needs. It is really rewarding going through this case.
More cases are coming and I will share with all of you later. Don’t hesitate to leave your opinions if you want to discuss anything in the article. Of course, you can leave message to say Hi, which is also very nice.
1st - Cross Selling Or Cross Purposes
The first one is a case about the organization structure. How to balance the sales and consultants within the organization? How to come up a rewarding system to encourage both sides to co-op but to have a conflict? It is a typical problem that the big organizations face all the time. This case let me recall my life in Chinatrust since CTCB was looking for an answer for this kind of problem. It is easy for us to stick to how to re-org the structure to encourage the mutual understanding between two parties but the humanity does not work that way, right? We all know this but tend to neglect this point when coming up a solution. After a long debate, Albert gave us a solution that amazed me a lot – to set a book value for each sales and a fixed ration of the book value for the other party. This method will contribute to a positive relationship between two sides and result in a useful evaluation system; you can call it a control system if you like. That is the value of MANAGEMENT! Without a good management system, even the best talents can’t really know how to deliver good performance in the organization.
2nd - All the Wrong Moves
The second case was about the decision making process of certain company and the leadership style of top manager. This CEO tends to be the “nice” guy who always looks for opinions and, usually, the decisions from other people. He tries to be nice to everyone so he can’t really gives his employees clear direction and makes the good decision based on the sufficient information. The decision process is loosing and no one really knows where the problem comes from. Of course, who dare to say the CEO is the problem. What is interesting is that this company hires a consultant to de-structure the decision process and to point out the problem. This consultant gives a presentation about the rough information he gets from several interviews with the middle management people. The direction to the answer is quite clear but the way to point out the problem might be very challenging, since no one is so stupid as to blame on the person who pays him the money.
3rd - The Cane Mutiny
The third one was about the HR problem. This week Albert assigned another reading material for me and Alex. The book calls MBA in a day. Honestly speaking, this book is quite skin deep for the person who studied “Business Administration” for years but I found this book very helpful. Although the content of the book is really general, the structure helps me a lot when tackling the case. Take this case for example. I read the HR chapter of MBA in a day this week so when I read the case about HR this week; I can break the case into the structure quickly and precisely. Combining with my working experience, I finally can come up with a suggestion that looks ok. The learning is easy for understanding but not easy for execution in the real world. HR needs to take the following steps,
1. Work with management team to pin down the short-term and long term goal
2. To find out the current employees’ capability
3. Find out the gap between the current employees’ capability and the capability that company’s future goal needs.
What is the most difficult part? I would say stage one might be the most difficult part for Taiwan companies since so many of them change the plan so often without solid planning structure and logic. “Losers are those who make decision slowly and change their decision often”. So CEO or the management team needs to do their duty to come up a distinct plan for their company then the departments know how to come up the plan aligning with the company goal. The case is talking about a company’s market is aging and its employees are aging as well. HR manager is afraid of the shrinking market might affect the bottom line of the company and also worries about the recruiting effectiveness and efficiency. So he proposes to invest more on the welfare to make the company a better place to stay, lack of reasoning between the problem and the solution. This German company should realize the developed country population is always getting smaller, no one can change that. So what it can do is to leverage on its core competency, the hi-tech and the know-how, to grab the market out of its local market. This strategy might totally change its HR plan. It might need to hire the sales from different market, which depends on its market expanding plan, and only leave the people with the core competency at the HQ. Becoming a global player in its market, the company should be looking for the employees with better mobility and flexibility and with more international experience to deal with the international working process. Moreover, how to retain the knowledge of the current aging employees and to pass this core value to the younger new comers is also a task for the HR department. Knowledge management is such an important system that this company needs. It is really rewarding going through this case.
More cases are coming and I will share with all of you later. Don’t hesitate to leave your opinions if you want to discuss anything in the article. Of course, you can leave message to say Hi, which is also very nice.